To confirm this, here is the official conversation:jimmy j wrote:I'm not sure if this has already been posted. I apologise if it has.
#fw chan - [c4eva] new fw in dev/test - ixtreme LT (Lite Touch) - more efficient, minimal patching, fw indistinguishable from orig
So yeah, it is the firmware they are detecting after all.
(23:39:52) * Neo- changes topic to '[c4eva] new fw in dev/test - ixtreme LT (Lite Touch) - more efficient, minimal patching, fw indistinguishable from orig'
(23:39:52) * Neo- sets mode: +l 2015
(23:39:53) * grrox sets mode: +l 2012
(23:39:59) <@[X]nWo[X]> not enough room
(23:40:00) * ayzee sets mode: -b nirv*!*@*
(23:40:02) <@Neo-> nope
(23:40:05) * Joins: flawl3z_ (~chatzilla@c-24-16-155-35.hsd1.wa.comcast.net)
(23:40:07) * Quits: fenix31- (~blah@CPE-72-135-116-156.new.res.rr.com) (Client Quit)
(23:40:13) * Joins: freshtrea (~no@173-19-128-203.client.mchsi.com)
(23:40:20) * Quits: afc1 (~gayboi5@5e0101ce.bb.sky.com) (afc1)
(23:40:23) * Joins: juditho (~compu_fix@189.231.99.123)
(23:40:27) <@[X]nWo[X]> [c4eva] new fw in dev/test - ixtreme LT (Lite Touch) - more efficient , minimal patching , all aspects of fw indistinguisable from orig, no more bans, No ETA!(23:40:31) <@[X]nWo[X]> dont ask eta = ban
(23:40:35) * Joins: appealing (~irchon@cpe-98-155-29-74.san.res.rr.com)
(23:40:35) <@[X]nWo[X]> dont ask question = ban
(23:40:40) * Quits: ps3suxxxx (~hghf@sud-cable-cmts1-69-60-228-242.vianet.ca)
(23:40:40) <@[X]nWo[X]> liteon will be 1st