Free content shouldn't need a Gold account
By Gary Marshall
iPlayer on Xbox: better late than never
Hurrah for Microsoft! Just four years after the iPlayer turned up on the Wii and two years after it appeared on the PS3, the iPlayer is finally available to Xbox Live users.
We've been banging on about iPlayer on Xbox for years, because the problem was never a technical one: it was Microsoft's bone-headed refusal to let anybody get their hands on iPlayer for free.
It looks like Microsoft has finally seen the light, and you won't need to pay for a Gold account if you want to watch stuff from the Beeb.
Unfortunately, you'll still need to pay if you want to do anything else.
Pay to play
While iPlayer's free, it's the exception. You still need to pay for an Xbox Live Gold account if you want to use other free services such as 4oD or YouTube -- and you also need a Gold account if you want to access services you're already paying for, such as Netflix or Sky. That's crazy.
One of my friends discovered the Netflix thing last night, and posted to Facebook: "I have to pay Microsoft to use Netflix (which I pay for) over my broadband connection (which I pay for) because I'm using their machine (which I paid for)?" After some very bad words, he added: "As far as I can see, the service they wish to charge me for is 'Having already sold me a machine capable of connecting to both the Internet and a television.' Anyone else charging for this?"
To the best of my knowledge, the answer is no. I don't have to pay extra to access YouTube on my phone, or Netflix on my Apple TV, or Facebook on my iPad -- yes, the Facebook app for Xbox needs a Gold account too -- and I can only think of two reasons why Microsoft is doing this.
Reason one is "because we're greedy".
Reason two is "because we're really greedy."
Microsoft gets money from our hardware purchases and a hefty royalty on every game we buy. It doesn't need us to pay for access to free online content too.
We wouldn't accept this on a Windows tablet, or on a Windows PC, and we shouldn't accept it on the Xbox.
It's time Microsoft scrapped its Xbox tax.
Free content shouldn't need a Gold account
Re: Free content shouldn't need a Gold account
and ur just figuring this out lol the xbox scene is so yesterday kepp payn for everything when u can do it for free on ps3 i rarely turn that thing on anymore with the exception to play a burned game every now a nd then the gaming industrie is emploding in on it self greedy people like gates,cliffyb,activision,but again owell people r gunna keep paying and they know it
Re: Free content shouldn't need a Gold account
hahatwi5t3d wrote:but again owell people r gunna keep paying and they know it
Not I
- dalecheesy
- Ally of Robinhood
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 8:08 pm
- Location: Sunderland UK
Re: Free content shouldn't need a Gold account
Me neither but then again my Sony tv has it all built in. Been watching different strokes on one of the channels. Can't believe i used to watch it as a nipper. Who you talking to Willis
Re: Free content shouldn't need a Gold account
haha
days gone by
days gone by
Re: Free content shouldn't need a Gold account
People are just realizing this now? Seriously, tell me exactly what you think you are paying for with a Gold subscription.
But there's no sense crying over every mistake,
you just keep on trying 'till you run out of cake.
you just keep on trying 'till you run out of cake.