Hey I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask!
I just bought a 360 premium and it came with the BenQ drive and HDMI ports.
But I am still a bit afraid to flash it using the Dosflash16 method.
What are the cons and pros of using the Dosflash method vs the Dosflash32 method?
For what I read the Dosflash32 seems easier.
cons and pros of using the Dosflash method vs the Dosflash32
Re: cons and pros of using the Dosflash method vs the Dosflash32
ive heard bad things about using the dos32.
if you are using a via chipset.the dos32 dont always do a goog job erasing the drive causing problems.
dos16 you do all 3 steps your self dump,erase and flash.
if you wont to wait there is going to be a update to "IPREP" soon that will do the benq drive also.that will work in dos also but it is very strait forward.
Klutsh is working on it now.
if you are using a via chipset.the dos32 dont always do a goog job erasing the drive causing problems.
dos16 you do all 3 steps your self dump,erase and flash.
if you wont to wait there is going to be a update to "IPREP" soon that will do the benq drive also.that will work in dos also but it is very strait forward.
Klutsh is working on it now.
Re: cons and pros of using the Dosflash method vs the Dosflash32
There is a new version of dosflash out. I don't know if it addresses these problems or not though. I think it's better to use doshflash16 at any rate.
Sadalius
No questions by PM please
No questions by PM please