UFC Set To Beat Up Internet Pirates

Have a read and let us know what you think.
Post Reply
User avatar
CoFree
Robinhood
Robinhood
Posts: 13414
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:38 pm
Location: In the Forest
Contact:

UFC Set To Beat Up Internet Pirates

Post by CoFree »

UFC Set To Beat Up Internet Pirates, RIAA-Style
by enigmax
Image
Image
In December 2009, Ultimate Fighting Championship CEO Lorenzo Fertitta testified at a hearing of the US House Judiciary Committee, claiming that the UFC is losing millions to online piracy. Now, in an RIAA-style escalation, the company says it will not only start suing sites, but also individual downloaders.

In 1993, the first Ultimate Fighting Championship aired. With no weight classes and virtually no rules (even head butts and groin shots were allowed) for some the violence was too much. Others, on the other hand, simply couldn’t get enough.

UFC 1, as it was later numbered, was a 86,500 buy pay-per-view hit, ensuring the originally intended one-off was repeated over and over. By UFC 12, however, the controversy generated by the events was reaching fever pitch. They were banned in dozens of US states and dropped by the country’s major pay-per-view distributor.

Many, especially the millions in the largely untapped international audience, turned to piracy to stay in touch, with VHS videos of the events passed around among the passionate and growing fanbase.

After introducing more rules banning the most frowned upon fighting techniques and mandating the use of gloves, the UFC was back on course to bring in the money, but by late 2000 it was all going wrong.

Then in 2001, casino moguls Frank and Lorenzo Fertitta stepped in and saved the UFC from bankruptcy with a $2m buyout. It was to be a golden investment.

Mainstream success for the UFC came on the back of the TV series ‘The Ultimate Fighter’ and the huge following it created. UFC 52 in 2005 generated more than 300,000 pay-per-view buys, doubling the previous best audience, with UFC 57 climbing to more than 400,000.

In 2006, things exploded. UFC 60 pulled in 620,000, UFC 61 clocked up 775,000, with UFC 66 generating a massive 1 million buys on pay-per-view.

Labeled by Time Magazine as “the fastest growing sports brand in the United States,” in 2007 it was reported by Forbes that the UFC was now worth a staggering $1 billion.

Despite this incredible success story and the huge wealth that accompanied it, in December 2009 UFC CEO Lorenzo Fertitta testified at a hearing of the US House Judiciary Committee on how piracy on the Internet affects live broadcasting. He claimed that his company is losing millions of dollars to the phenomenon.

“Just last month, the broadcast of UFC 106 from the Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas, Nevada, had over 271 unauthorized streams with over 140,000 views, and those are the ones that our anti-piracy team and consultants identified,” Fertitta reported. “There were likely more streams that we simply couldn’t find.”

Fertitta criticized sites like Justin.tv for carrying the streams, with ESPN Executive Vice President Ed Durso going on to name others involved including UstreamTV, LiveStream, TVU, channelsurfing.net, adthe.net, Sopcast, TVAnts, and myp2p.eu.

While UFC 104 pulled in a very respectable 450,000 buys, at just 350,000 the figures for UFC 106 had proven a disappointment, which is probably why the company singled out that event as a victim of piracy. Fertitta didn’t mention them, but other factors had affected the sales.

Ex-WWE star Brock Lesnar was due to fight at the event and had to pull out with illness and the replacement fight clearly didn’t mean enough for people to hand over around $50 to see it. With UFC 105 having aired free on TV the week before, casual fans had perhaps seen enough fighting for one month.

With a great fight card at UFC 107, however, it was good times revisited with pay-per-view buys rocketing to 620,000. Good product, good sales.

But according to the company, these pay-per-view buys aren’t generating enough money for the UFC. In a new interview, UFC President Dana White has confirmed that his company is readying a legal assault on sites offering unauthorized streams of their content.

For a company of their size, no-one should be surprised at this development. However, the next revelation will have eyebrows raising all over. The UFC will now, RIAA-style, go after individuals who pirate their content online.

“When people start going to jail,” says White, “people will stop doing it.”

After trying the cease and desist route in dealing with illicit content, White, who is famous for not being able to speak a sentence without cursing, says UFC are ready for the next level.

“It’s going to be a battle, man,” he said. “It’s going to be a battle, but I’m ready to (expletive) fight,” he said. “We’re gonna go after them, we’re gonna go after them hard, and we’re gonna hurt em.”

Lawrence Epstein, general legal counsel for the UFC, said the UFC could subpoena sites in order to gain the IP address of people who are illegally downloading and sharing UFC events.

Bizarrely, Dana White acknowledges that suing sites and individuals will cost a hell of a lot of money, more in fact than the UFC claim to lose from piracy.

“(Piracy) hasn’t cost us anything compared to what it’s going to cost us to go after these guys. It’s gonna cost us a lot of money, but guess what – it’s gonna cost them a lot of money. It’s gonna get to the point where it’s like, you know what, (expletive) it, maybe we shouldn’t pirate MMA any more,” he explains.

Interestingly, UFC commentator Joe Rogan, a long-time fan-favorite who is about to become even more popular with many viewers, doesn’t agree with proposed crackdown.

“I think that kind of stifles innovation. It stifles the direction the internet is going. I like things being out there,” he said.

“They’re trying to protect their money,” he concludes, adding, “but the internet is a strange animal.”

Having watched hundreds of hours of Jiu-Jitsu, what Dana White and the Fertitta brothers should realize by now is that for every move, there is a counter move, for every counter there is yet another counter. UFC will soon discover that it’s not possible to knock out, choke out or otherwise submit piracy on the Internet. Their opponents know all the moves – and then some.

But beyond that, forcing everyday UFC fans to tap out in court under a barrage of legal strikes is plain lunacy. This is a fight that cannot be won by force.
"FIGHTING TYRANNY in a TECHNOLOGICAL NOTTINGHAM"
Image
No Questions by PM.
User avatar
HaGGardSmurf
Ally of Robinhood
Ally of Robinhood
Posts: 4088
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:46 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: UFC Set To Beat Up Internet Pirates

Post by HaGGardSmurf »

I may end up turning to the internet as a means to watch the fights... The prelim's are always free, so I watch them, then end up paying 70 bucks to watch the fights. Turns out there are usually like 4 prelim fights, and 3-4 actual fights, so I pay $70.00 for 3-4 fights? Also, lately the fights have been pretty lame, look at richad and thiago, waste of money to watch that...
User avatar
CoFree
Robinhood
Robinhood
Posts: 13414
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:38 pm
Location: In the Forest
Contact:

Re: UFC Set To Beat Up Internet Pirates

Post by CoFree »

that is what pisses me off
you watch the perlim
free
then after you pay for the fight
they show the same damn fight again
in ufc 108
they show 3 of the same prelim fight again
that just pissed me off
"FIGHTING TYRANNY in a TECHNOLOGICAL NOTTINGHAM"
Image
No Questions by PM.
User avatar
strykr535
Herald of RHPG
Herald of RHPG
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:34 pm

Re: UFC Set To Beat Up Internet Pirates

Post by strykr535 »

Thats just crazy going after individual ppl i understand they are trying to protect there money but most of the time theres a ufc fight boxing fight or whatever majority of the ppl only wanna see the main event and me personally i am not about to dish out $50-$70 bucks to watch one fight that half the time doesnt live up to the hype and so what if ppl download there fights they should be happy that theres ppl interested in the sport without us watching them there would be no ufc so i think its pretty muffed up that these filthy rich greedy mofos are even thinking about doing this they make so much money off there fights,games,shows,toys,clothes ect. ect. and they wanna go head n try to sue ppl that are prolly downloading these fights cause they rly cant afford the fights in the first place its just crazy well good luck suing most these ppl they catch cause i know myself personally anyone tried suing me i wld jus laugh cause they wldnt b getting much from me especially if its $$$ they are trying to get out of me it wld b like trying get blood from a stone lol!!!

ohhh yea i dont know if this was part of the post or if you added this in cofree but this was very well said....

"Having watched hundreds of hours of Jiu-Jitsu, what Dana White and the Fertitta brothers should realize by now is that for every move, there is a counter move, for every counter there is yet another counter. UFC will soon discover that it’s not possible to knock out, choke out or otherwise submit piracy on the Internet. Their opponents know all the moves – and then some.

But beyond that, forcing everyday UFC fans to tap out in court under a barrage of legal strikes is plain lunacy. This is a fight that cannot be won by force."
Image

Image
User avatar
HaGGardSmurf
Ally of Robinhood
Ally of Robinhood
Posts: 4088
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:46 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: UFC Set To Beat Up Internet Pirates

Post by HaGGardSmurf »

Funny thing is Joe Rogan is all about internet piracy and dislikes 'the man' and all that kind of stuff... IMO they should allow you to pay to view individual fights, say x dollar's to watch just whatever fight you want, and x dollars to own a digital copy of that fight. I know loads of people who dont watch PPV's because they dont want to spend that kind of money since they are only interested in the main fight. If you could watch it online for a reasonable price, I bet lots of people would rent/buy the fight instead of googling the winner.
CoFree wrote:that is what pisses me off
you watch the perlim
free
then after you pay for the fight
they show the same damn fight again
in ufc 108
they show 3 of the same prelim fight again
that just pissed me off
Yea, 108 in particular pissed me off. I think im going to end up watching the ppv's at pubs/bar's im tired of paying for it only to be disappointed.
robbie2883
Peasant
Peasant
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: UFC Set To Beat Up Internet Pirates

Post by robbie2883 »

eh...i've been saying it for almost 3 years now.....the UFC is getting WAY too greedy and overzealous. i remember when the UFC used to be every other month or every 3 months and the fight card was FULL of great fights and great fighters....now they are just trying to pump out pay per views with a bunch of weak ass fights that no body wants to see at the rate of twice a month in some cases. guess what...sales go down when people don't care to see 5 nobodies fight and one weak ass main event that should have been an under card on a stronger event. but...nope.....they're loosing money b/c people are refusing to pay an exorbitant fee for a fight people are just watching to watch and not b/c they are really excited to see.
User avatar
CoFree
Robinhood
Robinhood
Posts: 13414
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:38 pm
Location: In the Forest
Contact:

Re: UFC Set To Beat Up Internet Pirates

Post by CoFree »

well the big thing is
The UFC has rules and the Pirates DON'T
there is not way they will win this fight

It is only a bone head that thinks they can do something the movie and music industry can/have not been able to do.
If they had common senses in that hard head of theirs they would see that.

they have to find a better way
who knows they may just teach the movie/music industry a thing or two.
"FIGHTING TYRANNY in a TECHNOLOGICAL NOTTINGHAM"
Image
No Questions by PM.
User avatar
HaGGardSmurf
Ally of Robinhood
Ally of Robinhood
Posts: 4088
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:46 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: UFC Set To Beat Up Internet Pirates

Post by HaGGardSmurf »

Ohh, just thought i'd add this in to show how the main fights are getting worse and worse.

Look at 109, coture and coleman, 2 dinosaur's fighting eachother... Randy's just going to use his clinch game on mark, its going to be boring.
Hackedit
Bandit
Bandit
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:49 pm

Re: UFC Set To Beat Up Internet Pirates

Post by Hackedit »

And whats really messed up.... the fighters in comparison to the money UFC makes is ridiculously low.

Capitalism begets greed.
Image

"It's really not fair for conscious beings to be aware of their own mortality."
User avatar
nufcmickey
Trusted Member
Trusted Member
Posts: 284
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: North East of England, UK
Contact:

Re: UFC Set To Beat Up Internet Pirates

Post by nufcmickey »

I believe this will only hurt them in the long run, I agree with what Joe Rogan is saying. In some aspects this will stifle the growth in population of the UFC, People will simply not be forced to pay for events. Luckily DTTV have sorted channel 34 out now so the live event dont cut off at 5am, It actually shows the whole thing till its finished. So Im fine with ESPN UK. But even though I carnt get enough of watching UFC, I love it. But theres no way if I had to pay £15-£20 PPV I wouldnt watch it. Id find some way of getting hold of it but I wouldnt ever pay that. Ive always thought it was way too much to pay for a single event. A fiver maybee but its just ridicoulus. I can see some sites being in pretty deep trouble very soon if this is true. We all know them aswell. :(
Post Reply

Return to “Front Page News”