Prosecutors Seek to Block Xbox Hacking

Have a read and let us know what you think.
Post Reply
User avatar
CoFree
Robinhood
Robinhood
Posts: 13414
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:38 pm
Location: In the Forest
Contact:

Prosecutors Seek to Block Xbox Hacking

Post by CoFree »

Prosecutors Seek to Block Xbox Hacking Pioneer From Mod-Chip Trial
By David Kravets
Image
Want a live tutorial on how to hack an Xbox by the guy who actually wrote the book on it?

If so, you should plan to attend what likely will be the nation’s first federal jury trial of a defendant accused of jailbreaking Xbox 360s — installing mod chips that allow the console to run pirated or home-brew games and applications.

Celebrity geek Andrew “Bunnie” Huang, the designer of the Chumby and author of the 2003 title Hacking the Xbox: An Introduction to Reverse Engineering, has agreed to testify for a southern California man charged under the anti-circumvention provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

The defendant in the case, 28-year-old Matthew Crippen of Anaheim, allegedly ran a business modding Xbox 360s for between $60 and $80 a pop. He was charged after he performed the silicon surgery for an undercover corporate security investigator with the Entertainment Software Association, then again for an undercover ICE agent. He faces up to three years in prison if convicted of both counts.

The 35-year-old Huang argues that mod-chipping is not a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which makes it unlawful to circumvent technology designed to prevent copyright infringement. He said he hopes to prove that point to jurors via a step-by-step tutorial.

“Basically, what he did was insufficient on his own to violate anything,” Huang said in a recent telephone interview from Singapore, where he serves as vice president of hardware and general manager for Chumby’s operations in Asia.

Additionally, Huang said, the DMCA should be interpreted to allow for “fair use” exemptions, so chipping a console for legitimate purposes would be permitted, even if it is found to be a circumvention.

The U.S. Copyright Office, he noted, just granted an exception to the DMCA to allow the jailbreaking of cellphones, and the iPhone in particular, allowing the iPhone to run third-party apps not approved by Apple. Modding a game console should be treated the same way, he said.

“The bottom line, I would like to see the scope of the DMCA limited to an appropriate statute that respects fair use, one that respects traditional rights,” he said.

But if federal prosecutors have their way, the scheduled Nov. 30 trial in Los Angeles won’t include Huang’s testimony. Prosecutors earlier this month asked the judge presiding over the case to preclude Huang from testifying on the grounds that his testimony would be legally irrelevant. The government says fair use is not a defense to a DMCA charge, and argues that Huang’s legal opinions are inadmissible. A ruling is pending.

Huang is no stranger to the DMCA himself. In 2003, publisher Wiley & Sons canceled publication of his Xbox hacking book amid concerns it painted a roadmap for DMCA violations. The book, which included chapters on “Soldering Techniques” and “Installing a Blue LED,” was ultimately released by No Starch Press.

Cindy Cohn, legal director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said Crippen’s prosecution underscores a flaw in the DMCA. Every three years, the Library of Congress takes requests to grant exemptions to the law. Months ago, the librarian sided with the EFF’s bid to exempt iPhone jailbreaking from being considered illegal conduct.

“We didn’t ask for game consoles,” Cohn said. “This is why the DMCA process, it’s a pretty inefficient way to think of how the law should be.”

Whether he’s allowed to testify or not, Huang hopes Crippen is acquitted.

“I would hate,” he said, “to have the wrong precedent set.”

Neither Crippen, his attorneys nor prosecutors would comment for this story.
"FIGHTING TYRANNY in a TECHNOLOGICAL NOTTINGHAM"
Image
No Questions by PM.
User avatar
CoFree
Robinhood
Robinhood
Posts: 13414
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:38 pm
Location: In the Forest
Contact:

Re: Prosecutors Seek to Block Xbox Hacking

Post by CoFree »

CoFree wrote: mod-chipping
keep in m ind guys he was using a modchip
"FIGHTING TYRANNY in a TECHNOLOGICAL NOTTINGHAM"
Image
No Questions by PM.
patastinky
Squire
Squire
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:39 am

Re: Prosecutors Seek to Block Xbox Hacking

Post by patastinky »

I thought the courts in the USA ruled that we are allowed to "jailbreak" consoles and phones. I mean it's not like the guy was burning games and selling them.. He was providing a service where as he would mod the xbox. I'm sure that as long as he didn't know what the modding was for then he couldn't be held responsible..
User avatar
HaGGardSmurf
Ally of Robinhood
Ally of Robinhood
Posts: 4088
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:46 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: Prosecutors Seek to Block Xbox Hacking

Post by HaGGardSmurf »

patastinky wrote:I thought the courts in the USA ruled that we are allowed to "jailbreak" consoles and phones. I mean it's not like the guy was burning games and selling them.. He was providing a service where as he would mod the xbox. I'm sure that as long as he didn't know what the modding was for then he couldn't be held responsible..
I dont think console's were included.

He is aiding in circumvention of anti-piracy measures, although he himself is not breaking copyright law's the cops are going to go after him rather than the hundreds of people who's xbox he has modified.

I doubt he will be charged with anything, but this whole thing is a grey area, seeing as he himself is only providing a service, and not breaking the law, but at the same time, his service is one in which allows others to break the law.
User avatar
CoFree
Robinhood
Robinhood
Posts: 13414
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:38 pm
Location: In the Forest
Contact:

Re: Prosecutors Seek to Block Xbox Hacking

Post by CoFree »

i dont know if any of you guy remember the bust that happen to all the sites and guys that were modding the wii with mod chip years back
the fact that he is installing a piece of hardware (thats the reason the mod chip its self)
the dmca says you cant use a chip for you jailbreaking

all the sites (guys) that were modding with software only they did not get busted
that is why all the usb dev boards for jailbreaking the ps3 have to come blank and you have to flash the hex file in.

the question is going to come down to this
what is the definition of jail breaking

my take is
if you jail break a device (could careless what it is) if that lets you do other stuff (any homebrew) than just play a backup then its a jail break and should be 100% legal
if you do something that will only let you play illegal or pirated stuff then it should not be.

but here the thing
I think it should be illegal to sale a item and tell the buyer what he can and cant do with it as long as it wont cause bodily harm to someone like a gun
in that case there would be no reason to even jail break because you could run your home made stuff if you want to.
"FIGHTING TYRANNY in a TECHNOLOGICAL NOTTINGHAM"
Image
No Questions by PM.
Post Reply

Return to “Front Page News”