C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
Assassins creed brotherhood requires update to play game. Im playing it on hitachi 79. Tried on a benq but didnt except update
- HaGGardSmurf
- Ally of Robinhood
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:46 am
- Location: Alberta, Canada
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
brotherhood is an ap2.5 game if you accept the update, you will be on the new dash, and your ap2.5 will fail (unless your using the retail copy of brotherhood)
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
im not playing ac brotherhood retail
- HaGGardSmurf
- Ally of Robinhood
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:46 am
- Location: Alberta, Canada
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
Seeing as your on a hitachi, the ap 2.5 check's dont matter for you.
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
Dont know if this means anything or not but I have the new dashboard that I got from the kinect adventures game disc and if I try to get online it still says a system update is required and signs me out when i say no so.........I am thinking that its not just the new dashboard update that includes the AP2.5 but just something the threw in with it when you take it online. In that case anybody who wants to use their kinect could as long as they stay off line until new firmware comes out. It's working for me 


- HaGGardSmurf
- Ally of Robinhood
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:46 am
- Location: Alberta, Canada
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
Guy's lets keep all the chat log's and updates to this thread.
I've added all the updates to the first post, and cleaned the log's so they are easier to read incase youve missed anything.
I've added all the updates to the first post, and cleaned the log's so they are easier to read incase youve missed anything.
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
Here is something I found with good info on AP2.5
From the se7ensins forums:
Difference between a RETAIL game and a BACKUP (burned copy):
Retail discs include a security layer that a DVD burner cannot reproduce. When making a copy of the retail disc that security info can be read and stored but cannot be rewritten on the backup the same way it existed on the original retail disc. That is why you must have a modified firmware (flashed xbox) that will be able to read/respond to that security information even if it is not stored in the same way as an original retail disc. This is what SSv1 and SSv2 refer to, the way the backup stores the security info to be read by the flashed xbox drive.
AP25 and YOU:
First off, FIFA 09 is not an AP25 title. Currently the only AP25 titles are Fable 3 and Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood.
What is AP25? Anti-Piracy 2.5 Simply put, its an updated security layer on both the disc and in the game files.
There is a lot of confusion on how AP25 actually works, many people just make something up or attempt to make it sound far more technical (scarier) than it really is.
Like the security system outlined above AP25 should work in the same way but with an added check. When you attempt to boot the game AP25 kicks in and asks the DVD drive to check some things on another security layer. If you have a backup of an AP25 title in the drive this check will fail because those security layers do not exist on the backup. Because AP25 is new, the current LT firmware does not have the ability to fake a response or look somewhere else for this security info if you are trying to play a backup copy. If you have the original retail disc in the drive the AP25 check will pass because the drive is able to location the security layer and return the proper response. When LT+ is released it should support this new security feature and be able to answer future AP25 checks without the retail disc. This is being referred to as SSv3 (our new fake security layer for backups).
**Ok, so without LT+ if I want to play an AP25 game like Fable 3 I need the retail disc?:
Yes.
What about the Nov. 1 Dash update? (Kinect Dash):
Dash update is safe. The only reason an old dashboard will not fail an AP25 check and the new dashboard will is old dashboards do not support the new security feature. Basically before the dashboard update on Nov.1 the 360 didn't look for AP25 because it didn't know it was supposed to. The new dashboard now has that support built in. Other than that, its just a dashboard update.
Why do people say Samsung and Hitachi drives are safe? Is my LiteOn/BenQ not safe?:
Some drives may be physically unable to read this new security layer (AP25 layer) and thus are considered "safe" from the new AP25 checks. LiteOn and BenQ drives are able to read this information and when asked by an AP25 title they will.
So, can I replace my 360's drive with a Samsung to be safe?
No. A drive is locked to the 360 it shipped with and cannot be swapped out. There is a method known as "spoofing"(copying some of the drive info to make the xbox think its the original) that will allow another drive to work. This is NOT a safe way to avoid AP25 checks. Even though the drive works, when an AP25 title asks for the check to be performed, your xbox will still "think" it has the original drive, so if it was a LiteOn or BenQ before then it will attempt to check even if it can't. If the check doesn't pass then your xbox will fail.
What happens if I fail an AP25 check?:
If you happen to fail and AP25 check for any reason your xbox will record this failure and your console will report back to MS that this check has failed. Currently it is believed Microsoft is collecting data for another ban wave using this information. Being flagged doesn't guarantee a ban, but MS is aware that your xbox did not pass.
I've also heard AP25 could be added to older games with a title update?! Is this true?:
Yes and No.
AP25 checks could only be added if the original disc had an AP25 security layer to begin with.
**If I fail an AP25 check will it prevent me from playing other backups?
No. When an AP25 title fails the test it does in fact return an unreadable/dirty disc error. Essentially, it is looking for something that cannot be found on the disc so the error comes back as unreadable/dirty disc. This is ONLY for the failed AP25 title and will ONLY happen on the backup. If you failed an AP25 check with say a Fable III backup, you can play with the retail disc just fine because when it looks for the AP25 information it will find it. Failing the AP25 check will not prevent other non-AP25 titles from playing nor will it prevent you from playing legit retail copies of the AP25 title even after failure. There is no corruption or dirty MS tricks involved with this, the backup disc you are attempting to play (AP25 title) really is unreadable since the AP25 data isn't there.
**Will the upcoming LT+ software fix my AP25 failure flag?
No. When LT+ is available and flashed on the console, even after a failed AP25 check, your backup AP25 title should then become readable as the drive can now look elsewhere for that stored AP25 response information. I do not expect the flag to be removed after flashing with LT+ due to the fact you can currently pass the AP25 check using a retail disc but the flag will remain if you failed the check prior. Think of the Xval(secdata) like the Windows Event Log. When an error occurs it records the error in the log for the Admin (in this case Microsoft / XBLive) to look at. What MS chooses to do with that information is still up in the air.
**As Jester pointed out in this thread, you can also write protect the NAND to prevent the xbox from being able to log security events such as failing the AP25 check. It will not bypass the check but if you were to fail the check it would not record the failure for future reporting to MS next time you are online. A guide for this will be added soon however it is recommended, unless you feel safe soldering things to the xbox motherboard, that you stick to double-checking your iso's before tossing the disc into the drive. If you xbox is already banned this may be of use to you as well.
From the se7ensins forums:
Difference between a RETAIL game and a BACKUP (burned copy):
Retail discs include a security layer that a DVD burner cannot reproduce. When making a copy of the retail disc that security info can be read and stored but cannot be rewritten on the backup the same way it existed on the original retail disc. That is why you must have a modified firmware (flashed xbox) that will be able to read/respond to that security information even if it is not stored in the same way as an original retail disc. This is what SSv1 and SSv2 refer to, the way the backup stores the security info to be read by the flashed xbox drive.
AP25 and YOU:
First off, FIFA 09 is not an AP25 title. Currently the only AP25 titles are Fable 3 and Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood.
What is AP25? Anti-Piracy 2.5 Simply put, its an updated security layer on both the disc and in the game files.
There is a lot of confusion on how AP25 actually works, many people just make something up or attempt to make it sound far more technical (scarier) than it really is.
Like the security system outlined above AP25 should work in the same way but with an added check. When you attempt to boot the game AP25 kicks in and asks the DVD drive to check some things on another security layer. If you have a backup of an AP25 title in the drive this check will fail because those security layers do not exist on the backup. Because AP25 is new, the current LT firmware does not have the ability to fake a response or look somewhere else for this security info if you are trying to play a backup copy. If you have the original retail disc in the drive the AP25 check will pass because the drive is able to location the security layer and return the proper response. When LT+ is released it should support this new security feature and be able to answer future AP25 checks without the retail disc. This is being referred to as SSv3 (our new fake security layer for backups).
**Ok, so without LT+ if I want to play an AP25 game like Fable 3 I need the retail disc?:
Yes.
What about the Nov. 1 Dash update? (Kinect Dash):
Dash update is safe. The only reason an old dashboard will not fail an AP25 check and the new dashboard will is old dashboards do not support the new security feature. Basically before the dashboard update on Nov.1 the 360 didn't look for AP25 because it didn't know it was supposed to. The new dashboard now has that support built in. Other than that, its just a dashboard update.
Why do people say Samsung and Hitachi drives are safe? Is my LiteOn/BenQ not safe?:
Some drives may be physically unable to read this new security layer (AP25 layer) and thus are considered "safe" from the new AP25 checks. LiteOn and BenQ drives are able to read this information and when asked by an AP25 title they will.
So, can I replace my 360's drive with a Samsung to be safe?
No. A drive is locked to the 360 it shipped with and cannot be swapped out. There is a method known as "spoofing"(copying some of the drive info to make the xbox think its the original) that will allow another drive to work. This is NOT a safe way to avoid AP25 checks. Even though the drive works, when an AP25 title asks for the check to be performed, your xbox will still "think" it has the original drive, so if it was a LiteOn or BenQ before then it will attempt to check even if it can't. If the check doesn't pass then your xbox will fail.
What happens if I fail an AP25 check?:
If you happen to fail and AP25 check for any reason your xbox will record this failure and your console will report back to MS that this check has failed. Currently it is believed Microsoft is collecting data for another ban wave using this information. Being flagged doesn't guarantee a ban, but MS is aware that your xbox did not pass.
I've also heard AP25 could be added to older games with a title update?! Is this true?:
Yes and No.
AP25 checks could only be added if the original disc had an AP25 security layer to begin with.
**If I fail an AP25 check will it prevent me from playing other backups?
No. When an AP25 title fails the test it does in fact return an unreadable/dirty disc error. Essentially, it is looking for something that cannot be found on the disc so the error comes back as unreadable/dirty disc. This is ONLY for the failed AP25 title and will ONLY happen on the backup. If you failed an AP25 check with say a Fable III backup, you can play with the retail disc just fine because when it looks for the AP25 information it will find it. Failing the AP25 check will not prevent other non-AP25 titles from playing nor will it prevent you from playing legit retail copies of the AP25 title even after failure. There is no corruption or dirty MS tricks involved with this, the backup disc you are attempting to play (AP25 title) really is unreadable since the AP25 data isn't there.
**Will the upcoming LT+ software fix my AP25 failure flag?
No. When LT+ is available and flashed on the console, even after a failed AP25 check, your backup AP25 title should then become readable as the drive can now look elsewhere for that stored AP25 response information. I do not expect the flag to be removed after flashing with LT+ due to the fact you can currently pass the AP25 check using a retail disc but the flag will remain if you failed the check prior. Think of the Xval(secdata) like the Windows Event Log. When an error occurs it records the error in the log for the Admin (in this case Microsoft / XBLive) to look at. What MS chooses to do with that information is still up in the air.
**As Jester pointed out in this thread, you can also write protect the NAND to prevent the xbox from being able to log security events such as failing the AP25 check. It will not bypass the check but if you were to fail the check it would not record the failure for future reporting to MS next time you are online. A guide for this will be added soon however it is recommended, unless you feel safe soldering things to the xbox motherboard, that you stick to double-checking your iso's before tossing the disc into the drive. If you xbox is already banned this may be of use to you as well.
-
- Bandit
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:49 pm
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
Surley only on a j-tagged box ???you can also write protect the NAND to prevent the xbox from being able to log security events such as failing the AP25 check. It will not bypass the check but if you were to fail the check it would not record the failure for future reporting to MS next time you are online. A guide for this will be added soon however it is recommended.
- HaGGardSmurf
- Ally of Robinhood
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:46 am
- Location: Alberta, Canada
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
Nope xbox doesn't need to be jtagged.southbound wrote: Surley only on a j-tagged box ???
-
- Bandit
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:49 pm
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
As soon as a tut/how to comes around, point me in the right direction please. It would be cool if that could be posted in the RHPG xbox other tutorial section or something.HaGGardSmurf wrote:Nope xbox doesn't need to be jtagged.
- HaGGardSmurf
- Ally of Robinhood
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:46 am
- Location: Alberta, Canada
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsZEDMh3pOU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;southbound wrote:As soon as a tut/how to comes around, point me in the right direction please. It would be cool if that could be posted in the RHPG xbox other tutorial section or something.
Its quite simple, there are alternate point's both WP, and GND so you can use them if you dont want to solder to the nand itself, but you'll have to google them, I think theyre motherboard specific. (IE: falcon has its own, xenon its own etc...)
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
<Added To First Post>
Thanks for all the chat log's so far man!
Edit By HaGGardSmurf
Thanks for all the chat log's so far man!
Edit By HaGGardSmurf
-
- Peasant
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:03 pm
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
Yeah its real nice being kept up to date! Think im going to have an anxiety attack though! its all to much for me! c4 your my hero! been following you for some years now and ive never been banned either, still havent updated my dash and im waiting patiently for lt + before i go on live again! thats the way you got to play it I think.....scars72 wrote:<Added To First Post>
Thanks for all the chat log's so far man!
Edit By HaGGardSmurf
Im good with all drives and im very interested on how where going to lift the new firmware from the slim, there's gonig to be some wacky tactics im sure... anyways! respect due to all on the scene and everyone whos helping the scene and a massive shout out to C4E! C64 was my first computer ha ha
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
# [2010-11-18 10.30AM] <******> c4eva can you tell me will we be waiting long for lt+ to be released?
# [2010-11-18 10:32AM] <c4eva> no
# [2010-11-18 10:40AM] <c4eva> Everything is going good to plan, maybe another week or 2.
# [2010-11-18 10:32AM] <c4eva> no
# [2010-11-18 10:40AM] <c4eva> Everything is going good to plan, maybe another week or 2.
-
- Peasant
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:03 pm
Re: C4E Confirms New AP2.5 Checks on New Dashboard with New Game
Wish I could understand hexadecimal programming, I used to program in assembly,pascal and cobol which are all low level old languages but I still cant understand how you can unscramble hexadecimal code, theres know one else doing it for the 360 so that just shows you the skill ivolved, whether we get bannned or not this is a remarkable skill and the fact that you get this for free or peanuts if somebody else does it for you is freedom! it helps us all forgive MS a little for its messed up hardware!! and not so angry when our kids ice skate on our beloved c.o.d. disc's!scars72 wrote:# [2010-11-18 10.30AM] <******> c4eva can you tell me will we be waiting long for lt+ to be released?
# [2010-11-18 10:32AM] <c4eva> no
# [2010-11-18 10:40AM] <c4eva> Everything is going good to plan, maybe another week or 2.